Defining and Regulating Cryptocurrency: Fake Internet Money or Legitimate Medium of Exchange?

By: Susan Alkadri

Digitalization makes almost everything quicker, sleeker, and more efficient. Many argue cryptocurrency is the future of money and payment transfers. This paper explores how the unique nature of cryptocurrencies creates barriers to a strict application of traditional regulatory strategies. Indeed, state and federal regulators remain uncertain if and how they can regulate this cutting-edge technology. Cryptocurrency businesses face difficulty navigating the unclear regulatory landscape, and consumers frequently fall prey to misinformation. To reconcile these concerns, this paper asserts cryptocurrency functions as “currency” or “money” and should be treated as such for regulatory purposes. It also proposes each state implement a uniform cryptocurrency-specific framework following the Uniform Regulation of Virtual-Currency Business Act. Such a harmonious approach would reduce compliance costs for cryptocurrency businesses, protect consumers, and provide satisfactory state and federal oversight.

Download Full Article (PDF)
Cite: 17 Duke L. & Tech. Rev. 71

One comment

  1. Digitalization speeds things up and makes them better. Many think cryptocurrency is the future of money. But regulating it is tricky. Treating cryptocurrency like regular money and having the same rules across all states. This would make it easier for businesses, protect people, and satisfy regulators.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.